- The
 opening scenes reveal little about why and how Brown &  Williamson fired Jeffrey Wigand. Instead, the film intercuts between 
scenes of Lowell Bergman working on a  "60 Minutes" interview in Lebanon
 and scenes of  Wigand's life after he lost his job. Is this an 
effective storytelling technique? What  do we learn about the two men? 
 - As the story unfolds, we learn that Wigand is the "witness who has been betrayed, and Bergman is the righteous crusader who has been hung out to dry." Does this story have clear-cut heroes and villains? If so, who are they?
 - The Variety reviewer calls the movie  "borderline 
pretentious"? What does he mean? Do you agree? He also writes that, "at 
157 minutes, pic feels at least 20 minutes too  long." Do you agree? If 
so, what parts would you cut and why?
 
5 hours ago